- Raw noise reduction rawtherapee full#
- Raw noise reduction rawtherapee pro#
- Raw noise reduction rawtherapee iso#
Raw noise reduction rawtherapee iso#
Turns out that there’s a little bit of difference in terms of ISO noise between D3100 and Z50. RawTherapee’s Noise Reduction is Kinda Trash But lately, RawTherapee started showing some problems.
I didn’t care much about Darktable - having found RawTherapee first - Darktable’s UI was too radically different for me to give it a proper, honest try when RawTherapee did its job just fine. Up until recently, my go-to program was RawTherapee.
Raw noise reduction rawtherapee pro#
This is neat, because while I do sometimes use Windows (and sometimes I’m even kinda forced to - Surface Pro 7 comes to mind, with no multi-touch and pen on Linux), I consider myself primarily a Linux user. Meanwhile, RawTherapee and Darktable are both open source and therefore come both in Linux and Windows variety. Not only does it cost money, it’s a) made by Adobe and b) no Linux. To my knowledge, there’s about three serious programs for photo editing:įor me, Lightroom is off the table. If you’re dropping big moneys on a proper camera, you’re probably doing so because you want to have the ability to edit your photos after you’ve taken them. I know that pro photographers will get triggered 2 3 Assuming they’d stumble over this blog, but it’s not like anyone is reading this., but I’m not a pro photographer. But it’s also half the price of its full-frame equivalent Z6 that outperforms Z50 by one ISO step, so I don’t really care.
Raw noise reduction rawtherapee full#
Z50 seems to get a lot of shit on the internet, mostly because it’s ASP-C instead of full frame. Which means that Z50 it is.Īnd then instead of spending €300 on a new lens, Tamius spent €300 1 2 Okay, FTZ is €260 and the 50-250mm Z-mount lens is €360 … so things aren’t quite as bad … Except that Z50 + 16-50mm + 50-250mm kit was about €500 over Z50 body. And it must be Nikon, because I have recently spent €300 on a 70-300mm lens, and I don’t want to spend that kind of money if I don’t have to. My requirements: must be mirrorless, because it’s 2022. In addition to that, I was also getting a little bit salty about the lack of certain features - most notably, video recording on D3100 is kinda trash and you can’t use it as a webcam, either. While D3100 has served me well, but it’s really not great in low-light conditions.
On this picture, there’s me, my friend Kris, and an insane amount of noise reduction working overtime.
Let’s just say that ISO1600 is that shadowy place over there you aren’t supposed to ever visit. Yes, there’s noise, but the focused part looks reasonably fine.īut ISO1600 is … well. Noise can be noticed from afar, but with enough noise reduction you might be still able to pass it off as an artistic choice or something: Not an excess of artism - after all, I was merely getting some test pics with my macro rings. ISO800 is where things get noticeably worse, but not disastrously bad. I consider this reasonably good photo in terms of image quality … but let’s skip discussions about artistic qualities. With sunlight, ISO400 and f/5.6 usually left me with “I don’t need a tripod, yay” one over triple digit shutter speeds. On D3100, I typically shot at ISO400 and with a f-stop that goes as low as I can go - normally around 5.6, because I’m a sucker for low FoV, and you can’t open your aperture wider than that. The results can be rather nice: Okay, I know I said “not a single cloud in sight” but this was still bright enough for me to avoid high ISOs. … as long as you’re outside, and the sun is shining, and there’s not a single cloud in sight. My camera of choice used to be Nikon D3100 (with stock lenses, too), which is a nice and decent camera for cosplaying as a pro photographer 0 1 Key phrase: cosplaying as. About two or three times a year, there will be an opportunity for me to take out my camera and take some pictures.
0 kommentar(er)
